Fair enough, but the risk of a hurricane is merely one more factor to consider.
And while a hurricane looks huge on the weather maps, the actual portion of the storm that represents a significant risk to one's well-being is very small relative to the total storm and the size of the Sea. A big storm will have a 100 mile radius hazard area (~30,000 square miles), whereas the context is that the Caribbean Sea encompasses roughly 1 million square miles, plus the Gulf of Mexico is another 600,000 square miles, for a total of 1.6 million square miles, which means roughly a 2% coverage ... or a 98% chance of the storm (given that there is a storm) being "someplace else".
Which is why IMO the chart's statement of "likelihood of having your diving vacation in the Caribbean disrupted by a Hurricane or Tropical Storm at various times of the year" is a bit misleading. Sure, it shows relative risk vs. time, but it is all too easy to misread the chart in that its peak of 80 storms in 100 years sounds too much like "80% chance", which can only true if your dive vacation is occurring on every island in the Caribbean simultaneously.
This isn't to downplay hurricanes ... they're serious business, and close calls can be stressful. My point is merely that if one goes to the Caribbean in, say, September, you're not utterly "DOOMED" to be hit. Just take the Caymans as an example: to be sure, Ivan was a big nasty hit in 2004, but when before that was the last big nasty hit? IMO, it was Gilbert ... in 1988. YMMV, but only two big storms in the past 20 years doesn't sound like all that earth-shattering of a track record. And granted there have been some others that have passed through .. Mitch and Lily come to mind, but I was on-island in the eye of Lily on the Brac, and 48 hours she passed, we were back out diving in flat seas and honest 200ft visibility.
-hh