So, I have liked posts.
I had no idea it could be construed as liking the person behind a post. I for the most part would have no idea who that person is if the person looks like the avatar (hint, I am ever so slightly fatter than a cuda, but the prevailing color tone in the avatar accurately reflects my mood after too many meetings...).
So, I am really curious, who here thinks that liking a post would be the same thing as liking the poster?
Edit: pushed the wrong button before I was done - continuing:
In particular I am glad that fabulous famous Marie13 did not hang me out to dry when I liked one of her posts and then contacted her after realizing she is in the same neck of the woods and asked her if she would like to hang out with my wife. What could possibly have gone wrong - me thinks after having read this thread...!!!
In my / our case it was all about my wife getting a little help and support and motivation to get more comfortable in the water - and I am so glad I made that contact, because the ensuing "snorkling in the pool sessions" made a very notable difference leading to my wife taking her OW class in a week... (and while we are at it, my daughter too...) While the outcome of all that really is uncertain right now, and while it is a (interrupted...) two decade old odyssey, it re-started with "inspiring poster" doing inspiring things, overcoming "hurdles", a way to contact that poster who in the end actually did inspire my wife to try harder and get over her fears.
All that said, if the person the OP feels creeped out by, after "liking her" (I only presume that means liking her post really) and after a PM contact to offer diving together received a "thank you for the kind offer, but no thank you, don't PM again" kind of reply from the OP and nevertheless "did not let go", then I would side with the OP. But if it's just as the OP described in the OP then I am still understanding the OP's feelings / suspicions in the matter (after all, I got a wife and have a daughter and with that a low "creep tolerance" is mandatory), but I don't really see that any boundaries would have been crossed just by that. I can see a neutral inquiry about how others and particularly other woman feel about it on the board as a fair question. Airing somebody out by name as was done originally seemed a bit (if all was just as per OP) "reverse-creepy" to me - and I would even have told my daughter so. I would have told her to work it out with the person via PM and only if that fails then pull out the guns as necessary.