My LE agency shoots and qualifies from moving vessels and it is not difficult to hit a man sized target from an unstable platform. Especially with a longarm weapon.
Mmm. Somehow I doubt any of the whalers have had your training to be honest. There probably isn't much call for small arms target practise for most fisherman - especially since it is illegal to own guns in Japan.
The boats looked around 50 metres apart on the video clip - I think thats well beyond the accurate range of most handguns even with both the shooter and target stationary. The fact the captain "didn't realise he had be shot" indicates to me that it would have to have been a small calibre weapon which further indicates how unlikely this whole affair is.
Given he was "shot" squarely in the chest, this would mean he would have had to have been directly facing the target too.. and we're led to believe he didn't see the shooter? Our eyes track activity, strikes me as very very unlikely he didn't see someone ahead of him pop up, aim and fire at him at the kind of ranges needed to shoot him in the chest. Didn't hear anything either I guess.
Furthermore, I don't see any reason at all for the Japanese whalers to shoot at him - what is in it for them? Warning shots or flashbangs maybe to make them think twice but shooting to kill? Hard to believe in my book.
I wish people would think more critically before issuing statements like this
I am very sorry to hear about any shots being fired at Sea Shepherd Captain Paul Watson. I have supported his team with fins. I admire and commend his teams' dedication to saving whales.
and at least recognise there is a high level of uncertainty in believing a press report issued by one side in a highly emotive conflict, especially given the past tactics of these "eco-warriors".