KJackson60
Contributor
There have been some great responses to this question and I would like to thank everyone for their input.
It seems the only changes made to the guide lines for participation in a SCUBA program as outlined in the Guide To Safe Scouting (revised) is the dropping of the age and rank requirements needed for a youth to participate in a troop conducted scuba outing. They no longer need to be 14 and First Class. Other than some amplification of the old guide lines I don't see much different. The dropping of these two qualifications IMO has made it more difficult to determine the suitability of a youth to successfully participate in this program. As an adult leader you have fewer opportunities to observe the youth in group situations and observe them as they "problem solve" if they are allowed to do SCUBA at a younger age.
I agree that the instructors will probably help weed out the scouts incapable of safely participating in this sport. However, just because a youth can pass the tests and do the skills to the instructors satisfaction does not mean the youth is mature enough to follow through with those skills on actual dives. A case in point. I have a youth who did wonderfully with the academics and in the dive portions of the class. He however is not a good diver as he does not stay with his buddy or group, tends to ascend to fast and is not attentive during briefings. He is not diving with the group any more as he takes so much watching that I can not keep an eye on the rest of them.
We do use Dive Masters as this is required in the Guide Lines For Safe Scouting and it is prudent to have someone present on the dive that has better emergency training than I do. But, just because we have a Dive Master does not lessen the Scouters responsibility for the youth. I would feel very negligent in my duties if I did not accompany my boys on their dives. By accompanying them I act as the second and sometimes third set of of adult eyes. I am also the buddy for any Jr. OW divers we may have on the outing. I also tend to act as "sweeper", that is I follow the group and "sweep up" anyone who is lagging behind or gets separated from the group. The Dive Masters can not see everything. Especially in the limited viz we have here in the mid-west. Nor can I expect them to be aware of each boys idiosyncrasies. He/she just does not have the time to get to know them.
I do have a complaint of sorts with Dive Masters. All of them to date want to act as underwater tour guides and not as underwater mentors. What I mean by this is that I would like the Dive Masters to actively engage the scouts in conducting the dive, not just following along. Encourage them to do the navigation, have them plan the depth(s), length and the surface interval of the dive(s). If they make a mistake correct them certainly but allow them the practice of the skills they learned in their OW/AOW courses. Otherwise they will never progress beyond entry level divers, and that would be a shame.
I just don't think it is appropriate to add a youth or youths into a diving situation until they have demonstrated the maturity and physical capabilities needed to dive with a buddy safely. A youth needs to participate in a Troops program over an extended period of time and attain a measurable level of self reliance and confidence. This allows Scouters ample time to observe and council them. It is only through this relationship that an accurate assessment of the youths readiness for diving can be formed.
That's my opinion for what it is worth.:cool2:

It seems the only changes made to the guide lines for participation in a SCUBA program as outlined in the Guide To Safe Scouting (revised) is the dropping of the age and rank requirements needed for a youth to participate in a troop conducted scuba outing. They no longer need to be 14 and First Class. Other than some amplification of the old guide lines I don't see much different. The dropping of these two qualifications IMO has made it more difficult to determine the suitability of a youth to successfully participate in this program. As an adult leader you have fewer opportunities to observe the youth in group situations and observe them as they "problem solve" if they are allowed to do SCUBA at a younger age.
I agree that the instructors will probably help weed out the scouts incapable of safely participating in this sport. However, just because a youth can pass the tests and do the skills to the instructors satisfaction does not mean the youth is mature enough to follow through with those skills on actual dives. A case in point. I have a youth who did wonderfully with the academics and in the dive portions of the class. He however is not a good diver as he does not stay with his buddy or group, tends to ascend to fast and is not attentive during briefings. He is not diving with the group any more as he takes so much watching that I can not keep an eye on the rest of them.
We do use Dive Masters as this is required in the Guide Lines For Safe Scouting and it is prudent to have someone present on the dive that has better emergency training than I do. But, just because we have a Dive Master does not lessen the Scouters responsibility for the youth. I would feel very negligent in my duties if I did not accompany my boys on their dives. By accompanying them I act as the second and sometimes third set of of adult eyes. I am also the buddy for any Jr. OW divers we may have on the outing. I also tend to act as "sweeper", that is I follow the group and "sweep up" anyone who is lagging behind or gets separated from the group. The Dive Masters can not see everything. Especially in the limited viz we have here in the mid-west. Nor can I expect them to be aware of each boys idiosyncrasies. He/she just does not have the time to get to know them.
I do have a complaint of sorts with Dive Masters. All of them to date want to act as underwater tour guides and not as underwater mentors. What I mean by this is that I would like the Dive Masters to actively engage the scouts in conducting the dive, not just following along. Encourage them to do the navigation, have them plan the depth(s), length and the surface interval of the dive(s). If they make a mistake correct them certainly but allow them the practice of the skills they learned in their OW/AOW courses. Otherwise they will never progress beyond entry level divers, and that would be a shame.
I just don't think it is appropriate to add a youth or youths into a diving situation until they have demonstrated the maturity and physical capabilities needed to dive with a buddy safely. A youth needs to participate in a Troops program over an extended period of time and attain a measurable level of self reliance and confidence. This allows Scouters ample time to observe and council them. It is only through this relationship that an accurate assessment of the youths readiness for diving can be formed.
That's my opinion for what it is worth.:cool2: