Well said, lamont!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
TSandM:Vayu, I recognize and empathize with your commitment to the system. The problem lies in the question, "What is DIR?" I think we can all agree with some core ideas, but then you get into the details, and at what deviation from doctrine are you "no longer DIR"? For example, and this is a simple one: GUE has gone back and forth about light cord over or under the long hose. Right now, it's over. 5thD-x teaches under. Are they not DIR?
GUE has just changed the mnemonic sequence for the pre-dive checklist from SADDDD to GUE EDGE. I can't remember the new one, so I'm still using SADDDD, as is everybody I know, since nobody has been schooled with the new mnemonic yet. Are we all not DIR any more?
See how ridiculous it gets?
A basic standardized equipment setup, strong personal skills, a commitment to team diving and sharp emergency procedures. As the complexity of the dive increases, increase the strictness of the standardization to correspond.
Not only do I think you can be a little bit DIR, but I think almost all of us are. if you look at ALL the prescriptions, we all fall short somewhere.
I think you might be mixing your Kool-Aid a little too strong at times
Vayu:Lamont, I agree with you as well. I hope you are not contributing that wetnotes statement to me. I still think it is important to realize that it is a holistic system and that while bits and pieces of that system may be useful to recreational divers it is essentially still not "DIR-Lite" and should not be seen as that. If any piece of the system is missing it should not be advertised as DIR at all.
At what point does a "DIR-lite" class draw the line between what is right and what is not? A system like this is more than the sum of its parts. When it all comes togethor there are emergent properties present that will empower the diver. I would be wary of any class that uses the DIR acronym but includes exceptions to the system. The class will probably be useful but the diver has a right to know what is included.
Obviously a "DIR with exceptions" attitude is not DIR at all. Call it something else.
There may be a large number of recreational instructors in the northwest that can teach similar skillsets. There are also a large number that would likely capitilize on the systems name without delivering the same standard of instruction.
The skills and attitudes are more important than the name which is why it is crucial to find a good instructor. For every good instructor there is likely an evil version bumbling around somewhere (and there have been some unfortunate examples of bad instructors in the northwest recently).
I am sure all divers will find any introduction to these skills useful. Regardless it is not DIR lite because it is some other animal altogethor.
TSandM:GUE has just changed the mnemonic sequence for the pre-dive checklist from SADDDD to GUE EDGE. I can't remember the new one, so I'm still using SADDDD, as is everybody I know, since nobody has been schooled with the new mnemonic yet. Are we all not DIR any more?
See how ridiculous it gets?
Just looking at their website it looks like the 5thdx Essentials Course is pretty much DIR Lite. It is on air, not EAN32, and the only required gear is either a 5' or 7' hose and non-split fins.lamont:The OP was the one asking for "DIR Lite" and there's no reason to believe that the OP would understand or care about the issues that brings up with actual DIR or GUE divers that have bought into the team diving / holistic approach philosophy. I would agree that I would prefer to keep the name different, and I think that's one reason why Steve White's workshop is called "Back to Basics" since it isn't a DIR or GUE workshop.