I have, so far, never penetrated a wreck but plan to do so next week on the Zenobia in Cyprus.
Enjoy the Zenobia, its a big wreck for a ferry, not that far from shore either
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I have, so far, never penetrated a wreck but plan to do so next week on the Zenobia in Cyprus.
. . .
Don't mean to hijack the thread but I am not aware of the agencies imposing any such limitations.
BSAC to name one
I interpreted halocline's comment as referring to the fact it is not taught in the vast majority of OW courses (even though the agencies may not prohibit teaching it). Instructors don't teach that way because they weren't taught that way. Perhaps things are slowly changing.
Talking about this are we then?: Clarification statement on Alternative Supply training and going diving - British Sub-Aqua Club
It is important that instructors teach to the current syllabus only and, where instructors have personal preferences for other techniques, they should not introduce them into the BSAC Diver Training syllabus without written approval of the BSAC National Diving Officer.
f. Under no circumstances whatsoever does the above infer BSAC accepts the introduction of techniques by individual divers that differ from those prescribed by the main training agencies. For example NDC is aware that ‘Primary Take’ methods are being promoted by some BSAC divers and instructors within BSAC Clubs, this is unacceptable to BSAC
Am I missing something ?
Nope I don't think you did, BSAC states their position, Based On your post I found the article, read it and I Leaned something new. To divert from their (BSAC) syllabus requires written approval. The other (main) agencies introduction of techniques is understood - While "Primary Take" is Unacceptable to BSAC.
Thus the Long Hose is by their understanding and definition, "Primary Take". I would also have to include the alternate-inflator config in this definition as well being that of a "Primary Take" technique by its method of deployment.
Interestingly so I do not disagree with their approach but I do not agree with it fully either.
the bsac training position is not about the long hose, it is about the "hog loop" way of wearing it. You can train (with bsac) with a bungeed or stuffed long hose but not a hog loop. You can dive a hog loop as long as you have been trained (obviously not by bsac).
The primary take business is something else. Do any agencies suggest that should be done?
gue :d
OMG I've never been "trained" to use a long hose/bungee backup. I'm gonna die. . .
What is that S drill about then? Preparing to have the regulator taken from your mouth or donating it to the out of gas diver?
I don't defend the Bsac position on your life expectancy.
One of the beauties of the bungeed backup is I never have to look far to find it.
I took Fundies and decided GUE was not for me (I was diving a long hose before then). I don't believe for a second that a panicked diver is going to do that silly hand across the throat thing (btw I have a yellow/green cover on my primary reg) I don't have to worry about where my backup might have gotten to.
In a similar vein, I have stumbled getting out of a surf line without my primary in my mouth. Having that secondary right there under my chin seemed like an extraordinarily good idea at the time