6’ 7’ long hose and jaw fatigue?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

brsnow

Contributor
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
767
Location
Denver
# of dives
200 - 499
I typically use a 40” on 90 degree elbow and necklace. Taking a class where I have the opportunity to learn more about the longer hose approach. I appreciate the no fatigue with current set up. Does the longer hose reintroduce that side pull? Also for a 5’9”in shape warm water diver 5,6, or 7 foot?i prefer a minimalist approach underwater if possible:-) appreciate it
 
No to any additional jaw fatigue. You set the appropriate slack with the bight in your waistbelt or your can light. Turn your head left to confirm your slack is just right.

84” / 2.1m is the common standard for a long hose configuration. This has been validated by a wide variety of divers all over the world.

You can deviate from that if you like. If you’re just falling off the back of a rec boat there aren’t many that will know the difference. However, know that along the way some may question (scrutinize) your reasoning.

Eventually you’ll run into a compatiblity problem if you pursue serious exploration dives regardless of environment. Know that the LH configuration isn’t for you but the moment you need to donate and navigate simultaneously. The length is there for a two-diver team that is aborting a dive under some level of duress.
 
If anything, I'd expect less jaw fatigue with the long hose since the back of the neck takes the majority of the weight of the hose. Also, for recreational diving, a 5 ft hose works nicely since it doesn't need to be tucked. I doubt a 6 ft would work well for you as it's too short to tuck, and its too long to not need tucking.
 
I typically use a 40” on 90 degree elbow and necklace. Taking a class where I have the opportunity to learn more about the longer hose approach. I appreciate the no fatigue with current set up. Does the longer hose reintroduce that side pull? Also for a 5’9”in shape warm water diver 5,6, or 7 foot?i prefer a minimalist approach underwater if possible:-) appreciate it

If you're going to long hose, 7ft for the shorter diver. For you, you may still want to use the elbow. I'm only 6'3" but long back and when using the long backplates the 7ft hose is not long enough for me. I would recommend getting a can light simulator or knife that threads onto the waist belt to be able to hook the hose as you definitely won't have enough slack to tuck it.
I use an omniswivel whenever I can which makes it much more comfortable.
 
I found it much more comfortable, less side pull, and easier on the jaw as you can adjust how much of a loop you want. I use a 7 foot and a “stick” to tuck it behind. It has been a great change for me and highly recommend it. I would suggest getting in some deployment practice and a swim having a buddy use it so you are ready when you need it. A good instructor that dives a long hose would be a good investment.
 
Thanks, likely a 5’ would do it. I don’t plan on going tec. I enjoy warm water and am always looking to improve. My soon to be 12 daughter will be diving with soon, so I like the idea of the longer hose, plus my dive buddy and I are not spring chickens and it seems safer. I don’t want to have to tuck or carry additional items. Looking forward to the class.
 

Back
Top Bottom