Tobin, thank you very much for that explanation, it was very informative.
Kevin
Kevin
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
This is where I see where a pinch flat could occur, sometimes after I climb into the boat after handing up my tank/BP/W, the captain or DM just drops it in the holder. When I look to see that the wing is smashed between the plate and the holder I just cringe, keep my fingers crossed that it hasn't flatted the wing.I watch carefully when I put a tank into the holders on a boat, because it's so easy to pinch the bottom part of the wing between the plate and the bench.
I asked the OP why he needed 6+ wings because I suspected that some of these wings were not being used by him. Turns out I was right
It was not. It was a tear at the top of the bladder. I could see it when I unzipped the wing. I could not see the injury to the second bladder.Was the first bladder injury due to a pinch as well?
If the problem were manufacturing defects what do you think the chances are that you would get two such defective bladders and, yet, not one else is reporting similar experiences. Talk about coincidence!!!!
I've had to have 3-4 DSS bladders replaced (in about that many years). None involved me dropping a plate on them. I'm quite careful about packing them, and travel with the wings and plates separated. In each case, I'm not sure what caused the bladders to leak. I can sympathize with the OP in that it is a frustrating experience (i.e. not knowing why they are leaking). If I'd obviously dropped my plate on the wing, that'd be totally understandable. In each of my cases, I had not. We own or owned wings from other manufacturers and haven't had any such issues.
I do believe DSS has gone to a thicker inner bladder and I don't think we've had a puncture on the newer ones, so hopefully this won't happen again. It certainly does get expensive to have to replace them.
Overall, however, I've been happy with my DSS gear. For reasonably-priced, American-made, innovative dive gear, it's a very good option. Hopefully thicker bladders will help prevent others from having future issues. [Now, if DSS would just start shipping wings with real corrugated hoses... ]
I am not sure how either bladder was injured. I could see the first one. I paid to have it shipped both ways to get it repaired. I could not see the second one. It was not used until I dove with it about 2 months after I received it. It sat in my garage with not weight/tank/back plate on it. My point is that I know of nothing that I have done other than unpack it that would have caused the injury described. And after having to pay to ship it to them again in two months, and pay to get it shipped back to me again in 2 months, I question how this second incident occurred.
Agree with TSandM. Not only just dropping a plate and wing could cause a pinch, but what if the whole thing is set up and the tank falls over? Smash-pinching a wing (bladder) to a bottom corner of the plate is exactly what would happen.
As for travel - DSS' wings have little rubber connectors, not sex bolts, and the wing may easily be "popped off" to travel separately.
Lastly, what makes me lean in favor of the manufacturer, is that an educated man would put this dispute before the "Court of Internet" -- not a means of resolving the dispute, but to bad-mouth and denigrate the businessman. This is a form of blackmail.
. . . all this over $50 . . . .
Just a thought; where in the garage was it and were you the only person accessing the area? If your household is anything like mine; George Carlin nailed it with a skit: My wife and kids are always moving or covering my $h** with there Stuff....I could not see the second one. It was not used until I dove with it about 2 months after I received it. It sat in my garage with not weight/tank/back plate on it. My point is that I know of nothing that I have done other than unpack it that would have caused the injury described...