This is a bit off topic, but as was pointed out earlier...this is ScubaBoard. Why are wings made with such expensive bladders if they are still susceptible to pinch flats? I have a dry bag that has had the hell beat out of it, tossed around, stretched with heavy stuff in it, generally abused...it cost me $30 retail and it still holds air. Why cant you make a bladder out of that?
A well designed wing will vent gas easily. Design choices that trap gas should be avoided. Trapped gas means the diver needs more ballast, and more ballast means more gas volume in the BC during all phases of the dive.
This my primary complaint with bungeed wings, the bungees create a series of convolutions that trap gas.
Wing bladders are "2D", i.e. two flat pieces of material are RF welded together with all the welding in the same plane. Think about a mylar balloon, mylar doesn't stretch, and birthday balloons are always puckered around the edge.
Sewn Wing shells are not 2D, but are 3D, multiple pieces are sewn together to create the finished shape.
If a fabric / urethane laminate or fabric PVC laminate (typical of dry bags) is used for a wing bladder it will need to be substantially larger than the shell in order to fully fill the shell. This will result in internal puckers and convolutions.
OTOH if a urethane film is used, which can stretch, the bladder will fill the shell much more smoothly, and reduce the "pucker factor"
There are other advantages to heavy gauge urethane films vs fabric laminates with thin urethane coatings, and these include better more reliable welds, no risk of delamination and to some extent the ability to patch small holes, but it is the smooth fit that dominates.
Having said all of the above I'm pretty sure if I dropped a Stainless Steel back plate from 6 to 8" high edge wise onto your dry bag it would no longer hold pressure.
We made a precision impact tester. A 1" diameter steel bar about 10 inches long fitted with a 3/4" diameter hardened ball bearing is the impactor. A hardened and ground steel plate is the striking surface, and a series of PVC pipes cut to various lengths provide repeatability on drop height.
The sample is placed on the steel plate, a given length of PVC pipe is held upright over the sample and the impactor is dropped through the tube on to the sample.
We tested a quite a few combinations of materials and all failed at fairly modest drop heights. When lots of energy is directed to a very small area, something is going to fail.
Tobin