You might try a thicker hood as a first step.
(But she's still right, and you're wrong.)
rx7diver
(But she's still right, and you're wrong.)
rx7diver
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If you don't want to get thicker undergarment you can get a piece of fleece fabric (300gr or more), cut it into the shape of your torso (like the front part of a vest) and stick it under your undergarment. Makes a huge difference, cost next to nothing and you don't have to add a lot of weight. It's IMHO better than a vest or a thicker base layer, as it just adds more insulation where you want it.We are both getting cold diving dry in cold water. We dive identical rigs. She believes we can help minimize the cold by simply adding more weight so we can, in turn, add more aire to our drysuits. I think this will cause a buoyancy control issue. My solution is to add thicker undergarments (which will likely drive us to add more weight). Which is the better solution? (If we add thicker undergarments, will the potential added weight cause similar buoyancy control issues?)
Adding more air won't give an even distribution of heat, and will will make ascents/buoyancy a little harder to manage if large amounts of air have to be vented. Using weight to try and solve an insulation issue is a poor idea.We are both getting cold diving dry in cold water. We dive identical rigs. She believes we can help minimize the cold by simply adding more weight so we can, in turn, add more aire to our drysuits. I think this will cause a buoyancy control issue. My solution is to add thicker undergarments (which will likely drive us to add more weight). Which is the better solution? (If we add thicker undergarments, will the potential added weight cause similar buoyancy control issues?)