King Kong Matt
Contributor
nitroxbabe once bubbled...
Why does someone lose all credibility because they say one thing you don't like?
Go back and re-read the entirety of this thread. I, in a civil manner that was noted by more than one person contributing to this thread, simply pointed out that if Lawman was really interested in answering a question about DIR, he would be better served by a change in tone with fewer emotionally charged words, i.e. cult.
In fact, NitroxBabe, if you re-read the thread, you will note that I conspicuously stated that:
I do not dive DIR, and I am not with you or against you in this cult discussion. I am merely trying to point out that, should you continue in this direction, you will, in my estimation continue to lose some of the credibility that is the only currency on this board. If that is of no consequence to you, so be it.
So, to address your argument more directly, yes, I believe that Lawman has and, through his continued behavior, will continue to lose some credibility on this board. But, your reasoning is faulty. It is not, as you state, because he said one thing that I did not like. To the contrary, I specifically stated that I was not against him, and that I do not dive DIR.
nitroxbabe once bubbled...
If you have a dispute with someone, do they become complete ****?
I never suggested that Lawman was a ****. Those are your words and not mine. I stand by my posts as being pointed, but civil. I don't use words that must be replaced by asterisks online so I would appreciate it if you would refrain from attributing to me your particular choice of words.