Curiously enough, I've had the recent experience of diving tables vs. a computer on two trips and got to see the difference between each.
I use a DiveRite Nitek Duo with the UWATEC BT as backup. While dressing, I dropped the Nitek to the deck and it went blank. Attempts at resuscitation were unsuccessful. My buddy and I had planned a 40 min BT at 110 FT max depth using 34% and 50/50 mix in a slung 40 for the safety stop. Generally, using the computer, this is a no-deco profile.
However, according to the IANTD Nitrox tables (always carried in my pocket), it IS a deco dive. So, (going from memory here) I "planned" a 13 min stop. We did the BT between 80 and 103 FT, then a slow ascent. When we reached the hang bar, my buddy's computer was WAY clear of deco, but we did the hang anyhow just for practice. Surface waves were 4 FT, so it was good experience (URRRP!). Switching stages and keeping yourself together when that bar is going up and down can be a little challenging. That ALONE, can create "issues" for the inexperienced.
After a 1 HR and 45 min SIT, we did a second dive with a 30 min BT, same results with computer vs. table. The following weekend we ended up re-visiting the same wreck (we got blown out down off Hatteras) with 32% and a 50/50 slung 40 following the same profile . My NEW computer was shipped by DiveRite to the Hatteras shop where we had the charter (oops...) so, again, I used tables and the BT. Same results, same deco obligation.
It really is interesting seeing the difference between the computer calculated profiles and the "credit" given for multi-level vs. the "deepest depth" approach on the tables. I'm planning on picking up some software soon to give it a try...
I use a DiveRite Nitek Duo with the UWATEC BT as backup. While dressing, I dropped the Nitek to the deck and it went blank. Attempts at resuscitation were unsuccessful. My buddy and I had planned a 40 min BT at 110 FT max depth using 34% and 50/50 mix in a slung 40 for the safety stop. Generally, using the computer, this is a no-deco profile.
However, according to the IANTD Nitrox tables (always carried in my pocket), it IS a deco dive. So, (going from memory here) I "planned" a 13 min stop. We did the BT between 80 and 103 FT, then a slow ascent. When we reached the hang bar, my buddy's computer was WAY clear of deco, but we did the hang anyhow just for practice. Surface waves were 4 FT, so it was good experience (URRRP!). Switching stages and keeping yourself together when that bar is going up and down can be a little challenging. That ALONE, can create "issues" for the inexperienced.
After a 1 HR and 45 min SIT, we did a second dive with a 30 min BT, same results with computer vs. table. The following weekend we ended up re-visiting the same wreck (we got blown out down off Hatteras) with 32% and a 50/50 slung 40 following the same profile . My NEW computer was shipped by DiveRite to the Hatteras shop where we had the charter (oops...) so, again, I used tables and the BT. Same results, same deco obligation.
It really is interesting seeing the difference between the computer calculated profiles and the "credit" given for multi-level vs. the "deepest depth" approach on the tables. I'm planning on picking up some software soon to give it a try...