In this thread and other accident threads there is a frustration that accident reports, whether they contain all the facts or some of the pertinent facts, are not more forthcoming. I agree with others that through factual reporting we can learn from the mistakes of others (assuming mistakes were made) and hopefully, not make those same mistakes. Reasons have been given, like legal, preventing embarrassment, protecting ego's, etc. I'm wondering if the main reason is the complexity of the factors that can lead to an accident that make a factual report difficult or impossible.
Alex Brylske, Ph.D. in his book "The Complete Diver" compares the difficulty of accident analysis for scuba diving and golf. He says if someone drops dead on the golf course they never call it a golfing accident. It's always deemed a medical problem with perhaps the exception of the exceedingly rare possibility of getting hit in just the right spot by a golf ball. In scuba however, it's not clear at first whether the death was caused by a medical event like a heart attack or a scuba accident. If I'm not mistaken a fatal heart attack can lead to drowning and a drowning from a scuba accident (ex. equipment failure) can lead to a fatal heart attack. It appears to be a "chicken and egg" problem, that is, which came first?
In regards to cave diving (I'm not a cave diver so please forgive me for any ignorance) I can identify four contributing factors to an in-water accident:
1. Medical problems (heart attack, stroke, etc.).
2. Equipment problems.
3. Human error (not following procedures, lack of good judgment, complacency).
4. Environment (cave collapse).
One of these factors or all of them can contribute to an accident. Given the complexity of a "scuba accident" could this be the primary reason why accident reports are delayed or not published?