njdiverjoe
Contributor
Except that the empirical data doesn't really support the "more conservatism: less risk" conjecture. It is probably true, up to a point, but as far as the recorded numbers are concerned, you have X in Y risk at low conservatism, and you still have X in Y risk at low conservatism. Well, maybe X in Y+1.
What exactly are you trying to say? That there is not an increased risk of surfacing with a GF of 100 versus one of 80?
I disagree with what your saying. Would you be able to point me to some data source demonstrating your point?