Have I understood the basics of decompression theory, GF99 and SurfGF?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

If the DC is "throwing" away old predictions because the "idiot" diver is not following them then what's the point in making new predictions? The fact that a "good" DC has the power and memory to do parallel multiple predictions is beside the point. Again, what is gained by assuming an ascent rate or by doing a prediction for NDL or for deco stops?

Here's an example of the kind of mess you can get yourself into if you don't do predictive calculations

1759651976153.png


Note that at 7:30, subsurface is reporting that NDL has been exceeded because the instantaneous ceiling, calculated without taking into account offgassing during ascent, is below the surface (or alternatively, because the instantaneous GFsurf is greater than GFhi) but that almost one minute later at 8:20 a direct ascent to the surface is still possible.

This type of behaviour, possibly acceptable in a simulator, is clearly unacceptable in dive computer whos reported ascent profile must be smooth and continuous.
 

Back
Top Bottom