njdiverjoe
Contributor
I know the replies here are more referencing deco dives when suggesting GF85 as being 'ballsie', but it seems that on basic rec computers, at least for the 1st dive they mimic GF95 (my observation with my Perdix vs my Mares RGBM. Not sure what it's like with repetitive dives yet). With this being used by people mostly ignorant of deco stress ( eg. riding NDLs), why are not more divers heading to the chambers? As was mentioned in another thread, rec divers are often experiencing more dec stress than deco divers, so shouldn't these computers be even more conservative of at least GF85?.
On a dive within recreational limits the faster tissues are the limiting factor, from what I recall the faster tissues can tolerate a higher level of supersaturation. On a deco dive you typically have slower tissue compartments as the limiting factor, which may not be able to tolerate that same amount of supersaturation. In addition, how you set GF-Low also plays a role in whether you bend or not.
I'd also argue that while rec dives may experience a higher level of supersaturation, they in fact experience less deco-stress overall as their integral super-saturation is much lower.
I know that for me, on a typical 200 ft dive in coldish (45-55) water I am comfortable exiting with a SurfGF of 85. For a dive with high stress or a lot of work on the bottom I'll extend my last stop until I feel good getting out of the water. I'll also add that while not an athlete I don't consider myself old or fat