Dr. Lecter
Contributor
Wait, are you talking about this chart?
Decompression Gas | Theoretical Efficiency Ratios
The baseline is air. I don't do a lot of air diving, and even less air deco (never), but just futzing with numbers, it seems that o2 is a bit more efficient than the above chart makes out.
For sport, I put in air (eww, gross) for 120min at 80ft. I set last stop to 20ft, and o2 gives a final stop time of 29mins with VPM+2.
Do the same dive with no deco gas (so air deco), and the last stop (20ft) jumps to 130min.
I don't think 130:29 = 1:1.4, but I'm certainly no math wizard and open to suggestion. You also might want to double check my numbers. I did it with a phone app.
Let's control for whatever the gap is between your software and the math that generated the relative efficiency table: all else being equal, what's the last stop on your software using 80%? That'll give you an efficiency ratio for 80 vs 100 according to your software. Then let us know the CNS loading difference between 80 and 100 for that dive...with the entire last stop at 20', it's going to be bigger than the gap I got when using 10' as the final stop.
Nobody's going to argue that the 20% inert gas content doesn't make O2 more efficient. The question is whether the DIR voodoo bull in the oft-cited Baker's Dozen about 100% O2 has any validity, or, whether there's a tiny sliver of efficiency difference that seems to be trumped by the CNS loading differences for many diving applications.