drrich2
Contributor
It's a different kind of interaction, and to a different extent, yes. But I see people basically ignore their own potentially detrimental practices, and presume to 'draw a line' indicating what they do is okay, but what the other does is wrong. It can be a pretty arbitrary line. Some of the thinking I've seen put forth in support of that doesn't hold up well with what others have reported in terms of real world experience.
Everyone can draw that line for him or her self. I have no problem with that. If someone declares their personal value judgment in such a way that it comes off as a claim of objective fact, that's apt to get challenged.
I'm not out to 'sell' and persuade anybody to go on a shark feed dive. Anyone who believes it's morally wrong shouldn't. I do wish for both sides of the debate to be put forth reasonably and let people choose for themselves. There is room for intelligent, informed people to disagree here. We are not arguing whether the Earth is flat!
One area I disagree with some on is my belief people should have that choice.
Richard.
Everyone can draw that line for him or her self. I have no problem with that. If someone declares their personal value judgment in such a way that it comes off as a claim of objective fact, that's apt to get challenged.
I'm not out to 'sell' and persuade anybody to go on a shark feed dive. Anyone who believes it's morally wrong shouldn't. I do wish for both sides of the debate to be put forth reasonably and let people choose for themselves. There is room for intelligent, informed people to disagree here. We are not arguing whether the Earth is flat!
One area I disagree with some on is my belief people should have that choice.
Richard.