What difference would that make in the scenarios being discussed?
If you don't think clearly enough to inflate your wing, would you think clearly enough to inflate your drysuit? Or are you implying that you would have a separate inflation system for the drysuit, so if you ran out of dil for inflating your wing, you would still be able to inflate your drysuit? In that case, aren't you just trading one potential problem for another (that you could find yourself out of suit inflation gas)?
Don't get me wrong. I'm totally onboard with diving dry for just about any technical diving, really. But, I am unclear on how you think any of the possible CCR problems being discussed would be mitigated by diving dry versus wet.
Was a bit of a tongue-in-cheek comment, although the thought has occurred to me, and it's not without merit (the non-thermal benefits of a dry suit).
My comment wasn't about the accident being discussed, but about my personal gear configuration in general - having a dry suit gives you redundant buoyancy. When I was diving OC doubles in a wet suit, I used a double bladder wing (in addition to carrying two SMBs, but those aren't nearly as good for backup as the second bladder). Now CCR is different in that I have another buoyancy source (CL), and I don't use my double bladder wing. It's still nice to have backup surface buoyancy in a dry suit. Especially since the surface can be more dangerous on CC than OC.
As far as the thing about the breathable dry suit, what got me thinking about that was one of your comments, IIRC. Might be better to standardize my gear instead of having one system (and one set of muscle memory) for cold water and another one for warm water.