It looks as if we will never know the cause unless the other diver who refused further treatment makes a statement.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
So that rules out DCS. Sounds like a problem with the scuba units. If the instructor did something unwise, it is not so hard to believe that the former student would follow his lead. So it could have been a problem or mistake that was common to both divers... Not two independent failures... I would think is more likely.
The FBI dive team leader says it will generate 17 lbs of lift as long as the skin (drysuit) remains intact. Assume a diver who was close enough to neutral to make it to the surface in the first place....Not necessarily, a body below about 100' won't generate enough gas to overcome the pressure and become buoyant.
Sad news. I guess there must not have been many technical divers available to search if he was found only 300' from his last known location. I guess it goes to show how hard it is to deal with these depths.
So that rules out DCS. Sounds like a problem with the scuba units. If the instructor did something unwise, it is not so hard to believe that the former student would follow his lead. So it could have been a problem or mistake that was common to both divers... Not two independent failures... I would think is more likely.
Yes, 17 pounds at the surface is about right. Now work out how much that is at over 200 ft. Arbitrary argument now, he was found at depth.The FBI dive team leader says it will generate 17 lbs of lift as long as the skin (drysuit) remains intact. Assume a diver who was close enough to neutral to make it to the surface in the first place....