Isn't that the facilities identification rather than the individual or do most facilities only have one licensed person.
meant facility...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Isn't that the facilities identification rather than the individual or do most facilities only have one licensed person.
You can look up who did the hydro by the stamp on the tank.... that code between the month and year is the specific tester's identification...
Sorry for the confusion - More to @JimBlay saying he didn't know who actually was testing his tanks, and a general statement to anyone reading this later....
It's possible the "2psi" was actually 2mL and the tank jockey rattled off the wrong units without thinking. Tanks sometimes fail, if they were so reliable that they <never> failed, we wouldn't really need to hydro test them. Exemption tanks probably do fail slightly more often than 3AA tanks, they are built to a different standard with thinner walls among other differences. Compare a 3AA 3180psi+ tank with an exemption 3442 psi tank of the same capacity and its obvious they are not all the same.
You should look in some industrial steel O2 bottles sometime (its harder than it looks with their NGT threads the valves are really in there). They are not as pristine looking as divers expect their scubasAnd it's not just the special exemption issue, my local fire extinguisher hydro places don't dry steel tanks correctly either. My plain painted Faber HP tanks were flash rusted by the time I got them to LDS for VIP the next day. Having them tumbled then cost more than hydro :^) I have asked them to dry them correctly, they just say "we will do our best".