ozziworld
Contributor
Of course you're right, there are no excuses for running out of air. The rules are posted and published everywhere and so many applications what to do how to calulate etc. In the end it is a matter of varying situations, experience and circumstances that create such emergencies.Question #1, what were you doing at 180 ft? Dives to this depth are normally planned with twin tanks, or else with a very large single tank and an H-valve together with a stage bottle.
A good diver never runs OOA.
And a diver who runs OOA is not a good diver.
You should always keep your depth shallower than 130 ft, until you take some tech training.
And in the range of 100 ft to 130 ft you should rely on the Rule of Thirds, where you use 1/3 of your total SPG pressure on the outbound leg of your dive, and the second 1/3 to return to the anchor line, saving the last 1/3 as a reserve. Your tank size should be determined to meet this Rule of Thirds, large enough so that 2/3 of it meets your needs for the dive.
Most recreational scuba is done in the range of 50 to 75 ft, and when you venture deeper, you need to plan your dive and your dive gear better.
That is how you prevent an OOA emergency from occuring, for single-tank diving.
And no, I have never run OOA. There is simply no excuse for it, other than amateurish inexperience.
In my case, I have to say that it appears most of these OOA emergencies applied to inexperience at the time of the incident. We were all inexperienced at some point right? My situation was following a DM/guide and totally trusting their judgement and assessment of my skills ("you've done advanced right? you'll be fine" ) Ha! that was the last time I showed anyone that card for a long time (Took the Advanced Class 4 months after my OW). I suppose I would have simply said "no, thank you" to such a challenging dive if I had known better.
My other OOA was more recent, involved a vacation diver that everyone was wary of. He had been out of the water for 2 years and refused to take a refresher course. I kept an eye out for him and sure enough he had an "incident". I did not know him but I overheard others talking to him and the 'red flag' was raised.
I think the depth of experience that this board represents is most informative to anyone who bothers to pick up on others' experience and learn. Wow! I must say that if this board had been around twenty years ago, I may not have allowed myself to be led astray by somebody else's judgement.
"The MORE you know the LESS you think you know: The LESS you know the MORE you think you know" . . . . . . had to mention my most valuable lesson I have learned over the years ;-)