Not true. The EON can connect to multiple tanks.
While the Eon can have upto 10 transmitters linked at once it cannot display 2 gas contents simultaneously which you would like for sidemount, where as the Perdix (and Ratio) can
Which is the point he was trying (I believe) to make
And I agree it's a significant function that Suunto really need to implement
algorithm used in suunto is very conservative
Totally incorrect. At it's most aggressive setting (P-2) the Suunto is almost exactly the same as Buhlmann (which the Shearwater uses) at 45/95 (again the most aggressive
While mid dive they might show quite different NDL (both + 60 mins) They both hit deco as the same time, and both give exactly the same deco times (caveat - baby deco dives less than 50m less than 15 min deco)
There is no difference between the 2 on repetitive dives either. My longest repetitive dive sequence was 48 dives over 12 days, including some deco dives, and there was no real meaningful difference between the times shown on both computers on each dive (I think the Shearwater once gave me 90 seconds more deco. so no difference
When coming shallower Buhlmann starts significantly crediting you back NDL at 19m where as the Suunto at 14m.
so no expensive battery change fee every 5 years
Both my Eons are one of the first (just over 5 years) both have + 700 dives, They've only lost 15% of their battery capacity. So this isn't an issue
I run a Perdix AI and Eons. They're both good computers, a lot of the differences come down to personal preferences - I happen to dislike compasses on computers, I dislike the Eon compass slightly more than the Perdix
I'm on record for not loving my Perdix, It's a fine computer, but I'd probably buy another Eon rather than another Shearwater if I were in the market at the moment. Actually I'd probably buy an OSTC 4 rather than a Shearwater - but since they're not available to the US it's a moot point for this discussion
But both are fine computers. The price difference differs between regions