I believe what he was getting at is that PADI encourages students to get involved in further training, requiring more instructor supervised dives, so that the new OW diver will get more experience without being "on their own" and at a greater risk. By making it "further training", they don't make it sound like, "You're still a rank novice and are statistically a high risk to hurt yourself, so somebody better keep an eye on you." It's far more flattering to make it sound like, "Now that you're a certified OW diver, why not get more training in these specialties?"
No, he made this original statement:
Since you're still alive and diving, then PADI must have worked out for you. The risk is mostly during the first 10 dives with a PADI cert. Congrats, you made it!
Then he was challenged as to where he got that information, and that is when he said it was internal PADI information. My question is more about the validity of both his original "first 10 dives" statement being where you are likely to die, and his statement that this is an "internal" PADI statistic given to their instructors.
I would like to see some verification of either or both statements.