CAPTAIN SINBAD
Contributor
Sure. I can share my experience and what I have learnt.
1. SHELL SUITS: Horrible overall. Even the most expensive ones. Yet they are the most "mainstream" because they do not offer any warmth and therefore create a market for various "thermal undergarments." Thermal undergarments is another nonsensical industry which needs to be bashed in a thread of its own but if you were to look at retail prices for drysuits, a good 30% of drysuit profit comes from "thermals." Purely from business p.o.v shells suits make the most business sense though they offer the worst diving experience.
2. NEOPRENE SUITS: Aaaaah! Now you have progressed to what makes less business sense to the brands to what is really good for YOU the diver. When I am diving in snow-conditions, I am using a 3mm neoprene suit along with walmart thermal fleece that I purchased for under 70 USD and I am warmer than the DUI diver who aborted the dive because he was wearing DUI and a DUI undergarment. I am feeling no cold and it literally feels like I am in the tropics. Furthermore people are asking me "How come you are sinking with so little lead?" These poor souls have been lead to believe by the marketing gods that Neoprene suits require more lead to sink. Theoretically this is true because if you try to sink a sheet of neoprene and a sheet of trilam then the sheet of neoprene will need a lot more lead to sink. When you build a suit from those materials then the neoprene suit will need less lead to sink because:
a) you are not wearing as much undergarment as you would wear under shell suits. No one ever talks about this when discussing how much lead is needed to sink with either suits.
b) you are not using as much air in your neoprene suit as you are using in your shell suit. When I was diving my shell suits, each time I felt cold (which was quite often) I would pump air in my suit. This would require me to wear more lead than neoprene suits.
It is due to these reasons that in warmer waters, 60 plus degrees my lead would be the exact same in shell as it would be with neoprene. As we approached colder waters and ice/snow conditions, neoprene would need slightly less lead to sink.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: In order for neoprene to have those advantages, it is important that the suit is not crushed neoprene, and is customized to your body in the closest manner possible. This is when you will eliminate the air pocket that needs "management" and therefore requires drysuit training and certification. A well fitted neoprene suit should fit like a wetsuit and should not have enough air pocket anywhere to cause float feet or any of the other scenarios you are training for in your drysuit class. This is once again not as convenient for the industry because stock sizing is where money is made.
My recommendation. Try these shell suits and then rent a few. See if you can rent or borrow those over priced Santii etc. Then, rent a few neoprene ones. I would recommend Seasoft, Seac and Scubapro. Then call these manufacturers and ask them to make you a tighter fitted one.
1. SHELL SUITS: Horrible overall. Even the most expensive ones. Yet they are the most "mainstream" because they do not offer any warmth and therefore create a market for various "thermal undergarments." Thermal undergarments is another nonsensical industry which needs to be bashed in a thread of its own but if you were to look at retail prices for drysuits, a good 30% of drysuit profit comes from "thermals." Purely from business p.o.v shells suits make the most business sense though they offer the worst diving experience.
2. NEOPRENE SUITS: Aaaaah! Now you have progressed to what makes less business sense to the brands to what is really good for YOU the diver. When I am diving in snow-conditions, I am using a 3mm neoprene suit along with walmart thermal fleece that I purchased for under 70 USD and I am warmer than the DUI diver who aborted the dive because he was wearing DUI and a DUI undergarment. I am feeling no cold and it literally feels like I am in the tropics. Furthermore people are asking me "How come you are sinking with so little lead?" These poor souls have been lead to believe by the marketing gods that Neoprene suits require more lead to sink. Theoretically this is true because if you try to sink a sheet of neoprene and a sheet of trilam then the sheet of neoprene will need a lot more lead to sink. When you build a suit from those materials then the neoprene suit will need less lead to sink because:
a) you are not wearing as much undergarment as you would wear under shell suits. No one ever talks about this when discussing how much lead is needed to sink with either suits.
b) you are not using as much air in your neoprene suit as you are using in your shell suit. When I was diving my shell suits, each time I felt cold (which was quite often) I would pump air in my suit. This would require me to wear more lead than neoprene suits.
It is due to these reasons that in warmer waters, 60 plus degrees my lead would be the exact same in shell as it would be with neoprene. As we approached colder waters and ice/snow conditions, neoprene would need slightly less lead to sink.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: In order for neoprene to have those advantages, it is important that the suit is not crushed neoprene, and is customized to your body in the closest manner possible. This is when you will eliminate the air pocket that needs "management" and therefore requires drysuit training and certification. A well fitted neoprene suit should fit like a wetsuit and should not have enough air pocket anywhere to cause float feet or any of the other scenarios you are training for in your drysuit class. This is once again not as convenient for the industry because stock sizing is where money is made.
My recommendation. Try these shell suits and then rent a few. See if you can rent or borrow those over priced Santii etc. Then, rent a few neoprene ones. I would recommend Seasoft, Seac and Scubapro. Then call these manufacturers and ask them to make you a tighter fitted one.