That's the exception rather than the rule, sadly.
yes it is but my statement is still accurate when responding to "doesn't everyone"
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That's the exception rather than the rule, sadly.
No, not everyone does. I worked for a dc and used one piece of kit we sold. I would not dive anything else sold there and luckily I was not forced to dive it just to make sales.
I dive and recommend what I believe in and won't compromise that for anyone.
That's the exception rather than the rule, sadly.
I think he means a neoprene drysuit, rather than a shell style drysuit. For example, check out the seaskin Ultra (rather than the Nova most people purchase). It’s outer layer is made from crushed 3 mm neoprene, meaning it’s pretty rugged and also provides some warmth, compared to a shell. With one of those, You could get away with Simple underarmour style undergarments.I’ve used a 7mm wetsuit in the cenotes and was way too hot. I was literally steaming when I emerged. I changed to an old compressed 3mm and was somewhat cold. It seemed like a 5mm would have been best.
I would prefer to use a dry suit though because it provides backup buoyancy in the cenotes. I had not considered using my Waterproof D10 because I assumed it would be much warmer than a 5mm. Do you think I should try it? I hate the idea of hauling it all the way to Mexico if I won’t use it.
Just playing devils advocate here.. I have worked in a sales industry for years. It’s pretty bad PR if your employees don’t use your products. Especially if it’s a competitive offering. I have noticed a pretty common practice for shop staff to be able to buy gear at steep discounts. Not just to rep a brand, but to be an expert in what the shop sells.
If your shop is selling crap gear that you can’t honestly endorse, then why are you working there! If there is really nothing wrong with the gear, but you are just a stubborn pita, you wouldn’t be working for me. *not accounting for time it might take to sell and buy new gear for a new employee etc.
Not trying to be a jerk, but I don’t see anything wrong with the person who signs your check, asking you to help promote the shop brands. If it violates your conscience, then how can you possible be a good rep for that shop?
I suppose my other thought, when I posted that initial comment was directed at reps (and shops) who switch brands. I have personally spent > $2k on a new “custom” fitted drysuit largely influence by the brand representative’s reputation and endorsement. Within 6 months, that rep switched brands and now fronts for the new “best drysuit money can buy”. Same goes for a buddy who dropped several $grand on cave/tech gear for a specific shop. And a year later seemed to be “all in” for another brand. My buddy voiced a “WTF” sentiment, when he bought gear in part with an assumption of a long term shop relationship and support.
I think. Local dive shops who are struggling to compete with internet sales would be wise to consider the long term impact of knee jerk brand loyalty changes.
I think he means a neoprene drysuit, rather than a shell style drysuit. For example, check out the seaskin Ultra (rather than the Nova most people purchase). It’s outer layer is made from crushed 3 mm neoprene, meaning it’s pretty rugged and also provides some warmth, compared to a shell. With one of those, You could get away with Simple underarmour style undergarments.