lairdb
Contributor
- Messages
- 764
- Reaction score
- 265
That's not how you calculate it. Assuming proper weighting, the only weight you are concerned about is the difference between the weight that results in neutral buoyancy at the safety stop with an empty wing and the point of maximum negative buoyancy (i.e. full tank at deepest point).
So 5lbs for the gas (Al80). Using your 24lbs surface buoyancy for the suit, we need to look at the difference in bouyancy between 5m and 35m. Assuming all the 24lbs is in trapped air bubbles, then it will provide 16lbs of lift at 5m and 5.33lbs at 35m (let's call it 5). So worst case is 5+(16-5) = 16lbs negative
Interesting. As I mentioned, I had excluded the compression to the safety stop, but you point out (correctly) that it is material. Using +16 at 15FSW due to compression, I think you still need to take tank buoyancy into account. The empty AL80 will be +3, for +19 you need to counteract with lead. That makes you zero at 15; you may want some extra to avoid corking...
@lowwall for a 7mm, one might choose to be neutral at a shallower depth to limit the buoyancy change between there and the surface. @rsingler's weight analysis tool (stickied in the Advanced Forum) indicates this could easily be more than 10 lbs from 15 ft. Rather than ascend every dive upside down kicking to limit ascent rate, a little more weight makes that expansion a little more controllable. This could add another 5 lb or more to the buoyancy difference you mentioned that has to be overcome. This only further underscores the wisdom of redundant lift for such cases.
Agreed. My calculations showed 8lbs difference in bouyancy between the surface and 5m. I like to take that last ascent from the safety stop to the surface really slow, fighting several pounds of lift would make that tough.
So yes on the need for ditchable weight or a source of redundant buoyancy in a 7mm. Personally, I'll stick with my drysuit.
...which I see you guys already covered.
ETA: I thought this was an interesting mental framing:
Quibble-able, but thought-provoking.[...]Ditchable weights are a form of redundant buoyancy.[...]