billy_b4c:
Hi Rick -
No, I think in the case of a professional that they would chalk that one up to your current affiliation, but all of this is really hypothetical. We can't get this data, if it exists at all. Imagine the lawyer feeding frenzy if one agency was to use it against another.
Well, thankfully, the fatality numbers for Scuba are as low as most any other watersport activity, barely enough to make it out of the statistical "noise" for the number of participants, so, whatever our gut feelings about agency shortcomings, the statistics support a "safe" rather than "reckless" package.
Here on SB we see every fatality and many get "loud" treatment and enough wild speculation to spread blame with a very broad brush indeed.
So, while I think there's a lot of "leaping logic" in most mishap threads, I still think it's worthwhile to reflect on agency practices, general and specific, and how they might be improved to lower our already very low mishap rate. Zero may not be attainable, but aiming for it constantly is the best way to get closer.
With that in mind, I think that "Diver Deaths by Agency" isn't something that can be quantified in a worthwhile fashion, but I do think that mishaps should be examined with a critical eye towards what the diver did and what the diver was trained to do, and whether there is an agency level action item in there somewhere. Often there won't be, because the mishap victim violated the practices & procedures he was taught, and sometimes it'll be an industry-wide change... but every now and then there's a need for just one or two agencies to change what they're doing, and we shouldn't sweep such findings aside as "agency bashing."
Rick