- Messages
- 22,171
- Reaction score
- 2,798
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
CDs on the same train of thought as I am. Narced out I'd expect him to get a bit behind on his EQ.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
With all due respect.... I don't think you could get to 300ft without realizing tht something was terribly wrong.
At about 165 I can "hear" that I'm pretty darned deep.... I don't know if you can follow that but anyone who has dived at those depths on air knows what I mean. I've been to a little over 200 on air and was thoroughly bonked.
If you ask me there's no way you could get to 300 by accident without being well aware that you had landed in a sh.t storm from here to Tokyo.
R..
Thank you, but it still looks like I have to strap it to either my arm or leg. Right?
I'm thinking that he meant to use it as a way of determining something about the ascent/descent in lieu of the profile off the dive computer.
Depending on how the ear drum ruptured and the condition of the tubes might reveal at what point the damage occurred and shed light on whether the diver was concious and in control.
This is of course pure speculation on my part as to his intent, and I could be totally off base in the way I read it.
They can tell if it ruptured on the way down or up? How's that possible?
Well, I'm not M.E. but I would think they might be able to get clues from the amount of trauma present on the inner/outer ear as to whether the injury occured on ascent or descent.
I'm not a doc either but that sounds like it would be beyond the capabilites of an examination?
Nah. I've watched CSI. They could probably even tell what brand of Q-tip was used last.