Let me start by saying that I am planning on taking DIR-F and that this post is not intended to be a negative one.MSilvia:Personally, I don't believe it's necessary for someone to be DIR in order to be a good dive buddy or a safe diver, but diving with buddies who are not DIR is not DIR diving.
Matt's statement that diving with a buddy who is not DIR is not DIR diving, is one that I've heard many times. However, it doesn't seem to make sense for a couple of reasons.
First reason, by way of an example. I believe that Curt Bowen is not DIR and correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Curt has mentioned that he has been diving with JJ and GI3 at Wakulla Springs. I'm using Curt as an example because I don't think anyone would say that Curt is a bad diver or a diver with an unsafe attitude. I think most people both DIR and non-DIR would agree that he is a well respected diver and explorer.
So, according to Matt's statement, JJ and GI3 would not be DIR divers if they went on a dive with Curt. That makes no sense to me and I find it hard to believe that this is what they intend to teach. This is what I would call the "letter of the law" versus the "spirit of the law". It seems that the "spirit of the law" here is to teach people not to dive with divers that have an unsafe attitude. We are also assuming that you are familiar with the other diver's equipment configuration and that they are familiar with yours.
To me, the letter or the law would mean that if you had an opportunity to dive with someone who was like Bill Main or Sheck Exley, but they were not DIR, that as a DIR diver you'd have to "just say no".
Second reason using the letter of the law. When a GUE Intructor dives with a non-DIR student learning to dive DIR, they would by definition become non-DIR divers themselves. I know that this is a rediculous statement and only use it to make the point that this must be more of a grey area than an absolutely black and white one.
Likewise, if a DIR diver dives with a non-DIR diver to share knowledge about DIR and subsequently, that non-DIR diver decides to take a DIR class as a result of seeing the merits of the system, it's hard to believe that this would be a bad thing and condemned by GUE. After all, in theory, you'd be making the diving world a better place by motivating someone to become a better (read "more skilled") diver.
Could someone clear this up? I feel like I've got to be missing something here on a practical level.
Christian