Ontario Diver
Guest
I've been reading this thread often and thinking alot
Maybe it waould be easier if DIR was DIRUWIC - Doing it Right Underwater In Caves....
But I am starting to think that the focus on the Gear and rigging it is NOT the primary value of DIR training. I was chatting with an GUE/IANTD instructor yesterday and he said that the great thing about a GUE or an IANTD course is that you can dive with any other "trained" diver without a 45 min predive discussion on the basics. If you remeber back to PADI, there is a recommendation (that we always skip when diving with our fav buddy) to agree on hand signals, OOA, missing buddy, etc, etc, etc.
But, if you are GUE trained (methinks!), these are already laid down in the "book".
My current thought (although, waiting to be corrected) is that the Standard Operating Proceedures and Immeadiate Actions, are teh real value of the course. ( The "we always do it this way" stuff) This decreases reaction time and decreases risk in a dive and in an emergency situation. In order for this to work, every needs to have a near-similar gear configuration. (I've seen the same concept at work in the Army - everyone tapes a large presure bandage to thier left webbing sholder strap. It really doesn't matter where everyone tapes it, what is important is that everyone puts it in the same place so no one goes looking for it.)
Within DIR, what came first? The long hose and bungied seconday configuration, or the the thought out procedure for sharing air?
My guess is that there are gear standards that are there for risk reduction purposes and there are gear standards that have been set up just so that every one knows where everything is. Both are valid if the intention is to make sure that in a low communication environment (silted out underwater) I can work well with the least controllable piece of equipment I have, my buddy
So before we complain about DIR Gear setups - perhaps we need to understand how it is meant to be used,not where it is meant to be used. If you are going to use the PADI standard of sharing air (not to open a discussion about which is better or "good enough) you need to use the PADI gear configuration. If you share air according to the WKPP standard actions, you'll need to use the DIR configuration. There is nothing inherently better about a 7' hose over a short hose IF YOUR BUDDY DOESN"T USE IT THE SAME WAY YOU INTENDED! (Does anyone have a story about a PADI diver going after the bungied Second?)
But yeah, I was originally put off by the "Right" lable and the attitude of some.
I'll hop off the soapbox now.
Maybe it waould be easier if DIR was DIRUWIC - Doing it Right Underwater In Caves....
But I am starting to think that the focus on the Gear and rigging it is NOT the primary value of DIR training. I was chatting with an GUE/IANTD instructor yesterday and he said that the great thing about a GUE or an IANTD course is that you can dive with any other "trained" diver without a 45 min predive discussion on the basics. If you remeber back to PADI, there is a recommendation (that we always skip when diving with our fav buddy) to agree on hand signals, OOA, missing buddy, etc, etc, etc.
But, if you are GUE trained (methinks!), these are already laid down in the "book".
My current thought (although, waiting to be corrected) is that the Standard Operating Proceedures and Immeadiate Actions, are teh real value of the course. ( The "we always do it this way" stuff) This decreases reaction time and decreases risk in a dive and in an emergency situation. In order for this to work, every needs to have a near-similar gear configuration. (I've seen the same concept at work in the Army - everyone tapes a large presure bandage to thier left webbing sholder strap. It really doesn't matter where everyone tapes it, what is important is that everyone puts it in the same place so no one goes looking for it.)
Within DIR, what came first? The long hose and bungied seconday configuration, or the the thought out procedure for sharing air?
My guess is that there are gear standards that are there for risk reduction purposes and there are gear standards that have been set up just so that every one knows where everything is. Both are valid if the intention is to make sure that in a low communication environment (silted out underwater) I can work well with the least controllable piece of equipment I have, my buddy
So before we complain about DIR Gear setups - perhaps we need to understand how it is meant to be used,not where it is meant to be used. If you are going to use the PADI standard of sharing air (not to open a discussion about which is better or "good enough) you need to use the PADI gear configuration. If you share air according to the WKPP standard actions, you'll need to use the DIR configuration. There is nothing inherently better about a 7' hose over a short hose IF YOUR BUDDY DOESN"T USE IT THE SAME WAY YOU INTENDED! (Does anyone have a story about a PADI diver going after the bungied Second?)
But yeah, I was originally put off by the "Right" lable and the attitude of some.
I'll hop off the soapbox now.