DIR controversy?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

H2Andy:
and not all DIR divers are tech divers

DIR-F is strictly a recreational diving class

Any your point is????
 
eric_in_az:
II prefer the term tech diving, and I believe the oceans have enough room for both kinds of divers.

Some tech courses teach philosophies diametrically opposed to GUE. And some divers go through GUE fundies because of a lack of confidence.
 
JeffG:
NO....I am an Impotent man. and if I am goiong to be Impotent, then I should dress Impotent. I need to ask Dave about his tux.

Jeff, I think you missed your last deco stop. That quip to Andy actually had nothing to do with you. It had to do with weenies and magnifying glasses.
 
eric_in_az:
I think a lot of the controversy stems from the phrase "doing it right" itself, which seems to imply everyone else is doing it wrong. I prefer the term tech diving, and I believe the oceans have enough room for both kinds of divers. Tech diving and its specialized gear evolved from "extreme" diving such as cave diving, wreck diving, and deep diving. I certainly wouldn't try anything extreme without the requisite gear and advanced training, and I'd want my buddy to be similarly prepared. However, I believe the average recreational diver who isn't going to dive in overhead environments or exceed the recreational limits for depth and no-decompression limits can safely dive with less exotic gear. Divers don't all have to be tech divers any more than everyone who drives a car has to be prepared to compete in NASCAR.

That's just my $.02 worth. I don't expect everyone to agree, but I think we should all be able to peacefully coexist.

You don't have to be a tech diver to subscribe to the DIR philosophy. Too many people look at it strictly as a gear approach when in actuality a team mentality is central to the philosophy.

They think everyone else is "doing it wrong" is often thrown out as a reason why people don't participate in DIR. In reality, you'll find that most people that lean towards a more DIR approach are not likely to come up and tell you "you're gonna die!"

The only time that I care about the way you dive, or the gear you use is when you dive with me. That's because as a team, your choices directly impact me and we should have clear knowledge and understanding of what to expect from the other person. It doesn't matter if it's a 40' reef dive, a 200' wreck dive or a 2000' cave penetration.
 
TheRedHead:
And some divers go through GUE fundies because of a lack of confidence.

I'm doing fundies so I can get the T-shirt, but please elaborate on your statement.
 
Don Janni:
Any your point is????

... that it's not accurate to think of DIR as a tech diving philosophy only ...

(i didn't know there was going to be a quiz or nothing... iwould have reviewed
my notes, man :wink:)
 
dherbman:
I'm doing fundies so I can get the T-shirt, but please elaborate on your statement.

Stop baiting me. I'm not going to name names. Check out the DIR forum and read some posts.
 
H2Andy:
... that it's not accurate to think of DIR as a tech diving philosophy only ...

(i didn't know there was going to be a quiz or nothing... iwould have reviewed
my notes, man :wink:)

Oh, sorry.... I must have overlooked the post where someone said it was.
 
TheRedHead:
Stop baiting me. I'm not going to name names. Check out the DIR forum and read some posts.
I was chicken...thats why I took it.
 
You're evil, Jeff.
 

Back
Top Bottom