nereas
Contributor
- Messages
- 2,735
- Reaction score
- 8
- # of dives
- 500 - 999
I'm not sure where you got amateur dive magazine. "Sources" is the NAUI dive professional magazine. The study in the magazine is not opinion, but a scientific study that includes information from the European Underwater Biomedical Society proceedings, "Undersea Hyperbaric Medicine 2004 and 2005", and "Aviation Pace Environment Medicine 2005". Bottom line, a 1 minute deep stop followed by a 3 minute normal safety stop resulted in a bubble score index (count of number and density) that was almost three times the score for a 2.5 min deep stop and a 1 min shallow stop.
There is much more to the study, but the bottom line is a deep stop of 2.5 min is more effective than a shallow stop of any length in prevention of bubbles. Hope you get a chance to look over it.
I know exactly what Sources is. I used to have a "free" subscription to it myself.
And if they are now recommending inverting the safety stop with more time at 1/2 MOD than at 15 ft, it smacks of amateurish. Go ahead and do it, if you trust everything you read.
From my own experience, 1 min at 1/2 MOD, followed by 1 min every 10 ft, and then finally 3 mins at 15 ft, represents the ideal egression from any NDL dive.