cfenton
Contributor
Enter a friend by the name of Lyle Griffith. His Dad was extremely wealthy (owning a company in the defense avionics industry). On his 16th birthday Lyle was given a new Ferrari.
Not everyone could be like Lyle. Thinking about it I felt sorry for him, as he never got to appreciate some of the more simple things in life that I did. I eventually owned a Corvette and a Porsche, but where was there to go for Lyle?
I'm sorry, but I have to call BS on this one. If you could have had a Ferrari you would have taken it in a heart beat! So would any other rational person. It's like when fat people call themselves big boned, it's just something they say to make themselves feel better about their circumstances.
Diving deep on air is more personally fulfilling. That's a new one for me.
The OP has an opinion that was shared by everyone in the recreational diving community not that long ago, not to mention the military and the commercial diving field. This was to "learn the air envelope before moving on to another gas." There is some wisdom to this.
I fail to see the logic behind this proposed wisdom. I personally chose never to dive a gas beyond an END of 100'. How is my learning to manage narcosis going to benefit me in my diving? Narcosis management is a non issue, I really can't see a plausible scenario where I would ever need to manage narcosis (except for diving in a remote location where getting helium is exceedingly difficult). It's definitely the easy way to do things, as you say, but I really can't see how that could be a bad thing in this case.