Uh, DIR teaches all of that, but as theory as I recall. Can anyone post any references to any of the things posted above? Nobody knows what causes narcosis, nobody is sure how O2 is equated into the mixture, and IF the theory is correct, then CO2 is highly narcotic.
BTW, I believe that 30/30 is the recommended mix for the 80 - 120 range ...
Mark[/QUOT RE: "Nobody knows what causes narcosis" is slightly off. Read Bove & Davis, plus assorted other diving med texts. Narcosis is apparently caused by the lipid uptake (physicists and M.D.'s: bear with me) of a gas which "swells" the lipid tissue in the neurotransmitter. The "swollen" nature of the neurotransmitter interfers with the electrical transimission from neuron to neuron.
All gasses have measurable narcotic properties, many of which show at depth; othes at 1 ATM. Think chloral hydradate and nitrous, the latter of which dentists use to calm patients.
The increase or decrease in the amount of gas absorbed by the neuron establishes its' narcotic point of effect. N2 has a value of 1.00 ( based on the alogorithim, the higher the number. the less chance of interfering, so to speak, with neuronal transmission). Argon has the greates narcotic effect at .43.
Of course, as this is science; therefore, all is theoretical.
P.S: The standardized mix/depth restrictions remind me of the (very useful, but only to a point) KISS mentality. Although I accept various DIR principles, not diving "best mix" is not one of them (I also take issue with long hoses used in all situations, but that's another story).
DIR, as a concept, has been around longer than Jarrod has been out of diapers. Therefore, there is more than one interpretation of DIR.
Decide what is best for you: Memorizing one congiguration/set of techniques or incorprating additional knowledge into your personal diving schema.
Dr. Peri M. Blum
"There are old divers and bold divers, but no old, old divers."