I like it!BabyDuck:heh heh...'dark side'...here's a tshirt our state's group is getting...
http://www.cafepress.com/ieda.38836379
Christian
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I like it!BabyDuck:heh heh...'dark side'...here's a tshirt our state's group is getting...
http://www.cafepress.com/ieda.38836379
Dude, I think you meantlamont:s/northeast/the planet/
MHK:The proposed changes will only serve to make the class even better then it is today. One of the comments I hear very often at the end of the class is "The class was great, but it was just too much information in too short of a time". Essentially what we are trying to accomplish is to remove that problem by extending the class to 4 days, and including additional skills that some, if not many, of the instructors already include.
For example, those that have taken my class all know that I always put in a toxing diver rescue. Until now that was beyond the scope of the class, but we felt it important enough to make in inclusive going forward. GUE is one of the only agencies that actually encourgaes it's instructor corp to exceed minimium standards, so what JJ did was to incorporate many of the advances that some of us were doing anyway..
I doubt anyone will be disappointed in the changes, all we did was to more formalize many of the excesses that we felt were important.
Moreover, we reduced the in-water ratio's to provide for a more complete hands-on experience. I believe most will see this changes in a positive light, especially given that the norm of the industry is to go in the opposite direction, ie; increase in-water ratio's, shorten classes, omit certain skills, etc. etc.
Hope that helps.
SeanQ:I was thinking along the same lines.
Bob or MHK: What would be the recommended route for someone who currently dives a single tank recreationally but wants to pursue tech in the future? I've read many posts on this board advising future DIR-F students not to practise skills before taking the class because it is hard to unlearn bad habits. So for someone like me who has no doubles training but wishes to learn, which would be the best route?
lamont:s/northeast/the planet/
waynne fowler:IMO I'd say put on the doubles, work on the buoyancy and trim. Get used to reaching the valves and going thru valve drills, I can't imagine why you'd take fundies in singles if you are going the tech route?.. in doing so you put yourself in the perdicament of setting up the rig & practicing valve drills on your own anyway or waiting until you do a far more demanding class to try all this stuff in. If your going to get jacked, do so in fundies not in the Tech 1 environment.
Derek S:English please Lamont, I don't speak code, it makes my eyes bleed.
lamont:y00 r n07 31337! u \/\/i11 b h4ax0r3d!!!!
Just saying that bob's not only one of the best instructors in the northeast, but also on the planet...