Interesting.
So you consider good buddy diving to include diving with buddies who are only equipped with one second stage?
I don't see where I ever said that or where anyone ever placed buddy breathing as a better option than secondary air sharing.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Interesting.
So you consider good buddy diving to include diving with buddies who are only equipped with one second stage?
I don't see where I ever said that or where anyone ever placed buddy breathing as a better option than secondary air sharing.
24940:You are diving with a competent and accessible buddy
You are at max depth and that depth is 25'
You are diving as a buddy team
Once again, this thread is not about diving with the incompetent, untrained or unwilling. It's not about instabuddies, it's about sharing air with a competent buddy or doing CESA and which makes better sense from a safety standpoint.halemano:and IMHO at 25 feet the risks of something going wrong on an air share with an instabuddy are far higher than something going wrong on a 25' ascent. The day I can't swim up 25 feet in complete control with no air is the day I give up the sport.
Calculus? What kind of equations are you running?As you get deeper the calculus changes rapidly.
You are putting words in peoples mouths.
Post #32The rest of your comments are just off topic static in terms of this thread. Valid point in another context, but not relevant to the point of the poll.
Post #41So far, six people feel it is better to blow off ascent rates and safety stops than to do a normal ascent, while sharing air with a buddy. For the life of me, I can't understand how that would be better.
So you find my direct reply to your previous post to be "off topic static in terms of this thread", but you are the one who brought it up and ASSumed to know the feelings of the 6 CESA voters. You are the one who set the parameters; choosing CESA neither blows off ascent speed or safety stop and a shared air ascent is not a normal ascent.At 25' max depth, you could dive for over 2 hours and still not require a safety stop on most tables. If you know how to do CESA, you could easily take over 30 seconds to rise 25'; I can exhale completely and then wait for over 20 sec before inhaling (just did it). A properly done CESA can easily be done at modern ascent speed (30fps) in your case.
Per the parameters of your situation; those voting for CESA were not saying they would blow off ascent rates or required safety stops. You are putting words in peoples mouths.
The poll doesn't describe or restrict the method of air sharing. Are you denying that buddy breathing is a method of sharing air?
Adobo:Interesting.
So you consider good buddy diving to include diving with buddies who are only equipped with one second stage?
I'm not surprised at all.
Self-sufficiency means different things to different people, and there are always those who distrust anyone else to be competent to help them.
I'd be willing to be the majority (if not all) of those who chose CESA would identify themselves as solo divers ... even if they do occasionally dive with a buddy.
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Post #44
Post #32
Post #41
So you find my direct reply to your previous post to be "off topic static in terms of this thread", but you are the one who brought it up and ASSumed to know the feelings of the 6 CESA voters. You are the one who set the parameters; choosing CESA neither blows off ascent speed or safety stop and a shared air ascent is not a normal ascent.
If this is not a violation of TOS it should be! If you have to resort to deception to make your point, you have no valid point. Both the above statements were made by Darnold9999; why would you edit your reply to make it look like I made those statements?