Capillary Depth Gauge - anachronism or reference...

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

You either do not understand my question, or you refuse to answer.
Either way, I see no point in trying to have a reasonable discussion with you.
Because an F-35 doesn't have a propeller?
Perhaps the right analogy is taking a spare wing....
I'm not suggesting that you replace your computer with a capillary! I see the capillary as an easy and reliable backup option.
 
I see the capillary as an easy and reliable backup option.
I agree, but my point is that the info it provides is of little or no value to the dive I am on and of no value for planning a repetitive dive.
 
I have to applaud the OP on his efforts -- and haven't seen a capillary gauge in quite some time; and least of all, that design.

Elegant.

I have always carried analogue equipment as back-ups, from watches, on down -- having had serial electronic breakdowns over four-some decades; but only negligible problems ever occurred with analogue gear, which typically only involved the quick replacement of a hose or maybe spool within a few minutes of returning to the water.

I'd buy a few . . .
You can buy on eBay NOW!
Capillary Depth Gauge 2024
IMG_4659.JPG
 
There are limits to anachronism…
You probably think that counting without a calculator and snorkeling without a computer Perdix - its anachronism?
By the way, the capillary depth gauge is the only one that shows directly and does not require calibration service!
 

Back
Top Bottom