Notice the difference in the numbers between the different algorithms and the manufacturers using those algorithms in their computers.
It is common in Rec diving to use a DSAT (again preference) because you get more bottom time when diving repetitive shallow type dives.
It is common in Tech (I believe, but I could be mistaken - I don't dive Tech) that a Pelagic Z+ or Buhlman (SP. ?) algorithm is preferred because it allows for deeper amd deco dives.
The MAIN thing for you to be aware of concerning the algorithms is again what type of diving you will be doing because it can play a huge part. If you are doing repetitive diving you will NOT want a Suunto or Mares because it will punish you on time for these types of Rec dives. There are countless threads here where guys on days 2 and 3 (doing 2/3 dives a day) on live a board vacations are having to sit in the boat because their computer will not let them dive (here that ALOT with Suunto computers).
Like I said, you can make a Suunto MORE liberal, but not so much that the profile and times will match a DSAT profile.
Is Suunto a bad computer for that? Not in ANY way. Suunto makes a GREAT computer and are world renown for their quality. There is NOTHING wrong with a Suunto dive computer. It is ALL preference and what works BEST for YOU and your needs.
Some divers like more liberal computers, some like more conservative computers, and some like the ability to adjust their computers as needed based on diving partners.
That's why they make all 3 versions - different strokes for different folks
US Vet - on what do you base your statements? You state you don't have the experience, but . . . where'd it come from?