H2Andy:well, it's not either or
we can cut back within reason, and bump up production within reason, and change our expectations as to what is possible and desirable ...
Now we're on the same page.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
H2Andy:well, it's not either or
we can cut back within reason, and bump up production within reason, and change our expectations as to what is possible and desirable ...
H2Andy:how are you measuring that?
H2Andy:the bulk of our electricity relies on oil, which we don't have in abbundance and have to import ...
Now lets put that into real figures that mean something. France gets 77% of its power from nuclear versus the US only getting 20%. Or looking at it another way, the French generate 6.68MW of nuclear power for every million citizens versus the US generating only 2.56MW of nuclear power for every million citizens. Yes Americans consume more energy per capita than many other nations, but energy consumption is more closely tied to per capital income (or percentage of national GDP) and Americans are making $42K per person compared to only $29K for the average Frenchman. There are 18 nations that get a higher percentage of their electrical energy from nuclear than the US, and only 11 that get less from nukes. Or we can point out that from 1993 to 2002, the US ranked 13th in the world in increased nuclear production behind such countries as China, France, Brazil, Pakistan, and even Slovenia. To the best of my knowledge there hasnt been a new nuclear plant permitted for construction since President Carter was in office and it has plenty to do with the old Energy Act he got passed on behalf of the environmental lobbies.H2Andy:well, explain to me how the US produces the most nuclear energy in the world, double what France produces, with twice as many reactors, if it has the albatross of the Sierra Club around its neck?
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/nuclear.html
Thanks but I was a builder of passive solar/energy efficient homes and happened to have 5 little gas wells on my farm until federal regulations of the late 70s forced me to cap the wells or sell them to a big oil company and shut down the home construction business unless I stopped calling my homes energy efficient or passive solar because they didnt meet the new criteria. Other than helping to draft proposed legislation to save the small oil and gas producers (which by the way would have saved thousands of small farms from take over by the corporate farms), I have never worked or received a penny from any petroleum energy company, and in fact I was a huge thorn in their sides for years. I will still poke them when they screw up, but Im also willing to give them credit when they do things well and help the American economy.steeliejim:.
Responded to those two points above. .
And thanks to Bill51 for his tempered response to me, given, particularly that he apparently is an oil insider.
Bill51:To the best of my knowledge there hasn’t been a new nuclear plant permitted for construction since President Carter was in office and it has plenty to do with the old Energy Act he got passed on behalf of the environmental lobbies.
ReefHound:Actually, we are the world's third largest oil producer, more than Iraq, Kuwait, and Venezuela combined.
H2Andy:well, yes... we are close to Saudi Arabia in production
but i was talking about "owning" the resource. our reserves are paltry, and at this rate, will shortly be exausted: