I can see a need for the instructor to manage the situation but his should not be an issue.
With the 15 year hiatus I can see the shop requesting proof of recent service and reviewing it against current standards like having a power inflater and alternate second stage. Other than that in the interest of YOUR safety it only makes sense to be in the gear you formerly used and assuming this is so intend to continue diving. As a returning diver in particular I would challenge this assertion. Any suitable modern gear is substantially standardized that nobody's safety should be in question if the instructor is at all knowledgeable and adaptable.
If after 15 years you are thinking about replacing the gear after recertification then using the shop gear may be a means of sampling what's new if what they offer represents anything but well worn bottom shelf stuff.
Fundamentally I'd like to think they are trying to protect all concerned from a student showing up with unsafe gear bought used or dug up from the back of the garage. I have no doubt that in some cases the revenue stream is part of the equation.
The notion that you must be diving their gear 100% and that it must be purchased, not included or rented is way outside of normal practice.
You might choose to make this practice part of your instructor selection process.
Pete
With the 15 year hiatus I can see the shop requesting proof of recent service and reviewing it against current standards like having a power inflater and alternate second stage. Other than that in the interest of YOUR safety it only makes sense to be in the gear you formerly used and assuming this is so intend to continue diving. As a returning diver in particular I would challenge this assertion. Any suitable modern gear is substantially standardized that nobody's safety should be in question if the instructor is at all knowledgeable and adaptable.
If after 15 years you are thinking about replacing the gear after recertification then using the shop gear may be a means of sampling what's new if what they offer represents anything but well worn bottom shelf stuff.
Fundamentally I'd like to think they are trying to protect all concerned from a student showing up with unsafe gear bought used or dug up from the back of the garage. I have no doubt that in some cases the revenue stream is part of the equation.
The notion that you must be diving their gear 100% and that it must be purchased, not included or rented is way outside of normal practice.
You might choose to make this practice part of your instructor selection process.
Pete