cold_water:
This is slightly OT, but let me ask still. Technically, you're right, although I admit I don't know fi there's an actual metal plate inside the transpac or a plastic lump, but nonetheless, I'll take your word for it. You probably know better than I do. Question is, thoug, given that:
There is no metal plate inside. I called Dive Rite and asked. And I looked for myself later. When I was looking to buy a BP/W the saleperson tried to sell me a transpac instead and I wouldn't buy until I did some research...
cold_water:
-within the dive rite system, you can use all the wings they make both on the BP and transpac, you can use the same weight system, the different accessories, the pockets and what not
This is true. However, the question is HOW do they mount? And do you want to use Dive Rite's wings, weight system, and accessories. For me, the answer was no. I didn't particularly care for their wings, I wore a basic weightbelt which I prefered, and I didn't want to use any of the accessories.
cold_water:
-One can mount both singles and doubles on the BP and the transpac
Have you ever seen doubles mounted on the transpac? How about a rebreather? That's one we do at the shop regularly. It took me about 10 minutes to fit a Megalodon rebreather to my BP/W. Fitting the new transpac to a student Meg took quite a lot longer. Over an hour to be exact. Doubles aren't clean either.
cold_water:
-the transpac harness (waist strap and shoulder strap position) are pretty much identical
Note where the D-Rings fall. For technical divers, who like to tuck their lights under their arms attached to a d-ring, and who carry decompression bottles on that d-ring, and stage bottles, the d-ring position is very important. Unfortunately with the transpac teh adjustability simply cannot match a hog harness. I've tried it.
cold_water:
is there really an advantage to using the BP over the transpac aside from the (dare I say) slight reduction in bulk due to removing the padding and "back plastic mounting support" by replacing it by a plate? Is that reduction sufficient to justify using the BP for applications where size is important, like wreck penetration or cave diving? Is that the only advantage?
For my intended use, the BP/W is a better choice. For others that may well not be true. If I was doing primarily single tank diving, not slinging tanks, or planning to scooter, then the Transpac would be quite a nice option. The plate in a traditional BP/W system acts as a spine, holding all the parts together. Honestly, if I had to jump in the water with a couple stage bottles attached and a set of 104's on my back, I don't think I'd trust the Transpac. Doesn't meant it's not a good system.
cold_water:
I'm asking genuinely, since I'm not a very experienced diver and I've been looking at bp and wings myself for a while, wondering if I should make the switch soon. I'm thinking of buying a bp/wing combo soon and was looking at the transpac. I don't think my diving really justifies getting a proper BP, although, with diverite, since they're interchangeable, if I ever see the need, I could always get one of their proper BP and use that for the dives where it would be necessary, although I can't foresee that at the time being.
There are certainly lots of ways to go. The Transpac is a great option for a lot of people. For me, buying a BP/W ensured me that no matter how far I wanted to push my diving, cave, wreck, rebreather, multiple stage, etc., my system would always move with me. It would offer infinte adjustability. The "spine" of the system would never fail. And the harness would cost $12 to change. I could change wings in 1 minute flat without tools, regardless of who's name was on the wing. In other words, it was infinitely flexible, inexpensive, and brand agnostic. I try not to lock myself into proprietary solutions if I can possibly do so. You have to make the right choice for you and your diving.