Interesting idea. There are some unique geographical points of reference that you would not necessary find in other areas, so it would be hard to recreate. The eastern most point of Florida is located on the north jetty of the inlet just south and east of Phil Foster Park, just a little less than a mile away as the crow (or Pelican if you like) files. The constantly changing tide, large tidal prism, and proximity to Gulf Stream results in a large advection of species that would be difficult to duplicate anywhere. Also the continental shelf along the trailing edge continents is usually very wide, not the case just east of that inlet. Continental shelf only has a width of 5-8 miles off that inlet, so in addition to the Gulf Stream there is exceedingly deep water (far greater than the 200 meter depth of continental shelf) not far away. I am not sure exactly how, but the mix of saltwater and brackish water also has an affect on what species show up there. Just north of the bridge is the terminus to Lake Worth Lagoon, there is a ton of mangroves just a few miles away, since the mangroves are a nursey for all manner of species, I am sure this helps with species count at BHB as well.Got the issue; haven't read the article yet. The excessive visitation the sites gets raises an interesting question: how difficult would it be to somewhat duplicate it, even on a smaller scale?
I'm not talking about making a new major bridge. I've dove BHB once, and St. Croix's Frederiksted Pier once. Both are famous, and have something big in common...pilings, columns, whatever you want to call them. That's what things grow on. I saw a number of things at BHB that weren't directly on pilings, but the structure draws in animals seeking shelter, prey, etc...
So let's say a city wanted a similar dive area. Pick a somewhat sheltered region right off shore, and put in something functionally similar to the pilings. Might not have to be multiple giant concrete cylinders; just as a bicycle frame works with hollow pipes, perhaps the project would work with something cheaper. I don't know what materials would work best.
So far, when I hear 'artificial reef,' I think of deliberately sunken wrecks (which are very expensive and sunken in much deeper water) or clusters of discarded tires (which didn't work and made a mess, plus hermit crabs are prone to die in them).
I'm not saying a city could completely recreate the BHB experience for divers (and let's be clear, they'd include fishermen; maybe there could be different sections), but how much is feasible?
If you check the Blue Heron Bridge project on inaturalist.org, https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/the-blue-heron-bridge-project it has 628 species for 5300 observations. If you check REEF.org top stats page, Top Stats | Reef Environmental Education Foundation, there are been 454 species of fish observed at BHB for approximately 2500 surveys reported from there. We can make a comparison to say a pier located in the ocean not to far away. At Lauderdale By The Sea, the Anglin fishing pier is approximately 830 feet long. Only 1/3 of the pier is allowed to be used for fishing because it in bad need of repair and the owner cannot afford it. Lauderdale by the Sea (Commercial Pier Reefs/Datura Avenue) is also on the same REEF top stats page it has 363 species observed for approximately 1500 surveys. The area surrounding the pier and under the pier does not yield the same amount of species as BHB. I have done well over 1.000 surveys at each site, they are just not the same.
I think its a good idea. I think areas could be created that attracted a lot of species, but I also think BHB is truly unique in its draw of species because of the reasons outlined above, and others we don't entirely understand.