A few people requested via PM that I post some sort of curriculum vitae or resume. I have kept myself anonymous, but included a biography on the page. The swimming and snorkeling articles have also been expanded.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I think it's only fair that these people also identify themselves and send you their c.v. to post on your website as well.A few people requested via PM that I post some sort of curriculum vitae or resume. I have kept myself anonymous, but included a biography on the page. The swimming and snorkeling articles have also been expanded.
I think it's only fair that these people also identify themselves and send you their c.v. to post on your website as well.
Now with the swimming skills. I think if people learned those skills it would make them more comfortable in the water. I don't think they are necessary for diving but are really handy skills to have for comfort in the water and also general fitness. When I did Rescue class we had to do a few of them - underwater 25m swim and tow a diver 50m (we did this multiple times). Most people (we had a fair mix of age and fitness) managed after a few goes so it isn't beyond most people's abilities in my opinion. Another thing we had to do was tread water for 5mins holding 6lb out of the water. Not sure what the purpose was behind that one though. Swim was 300m any stroke, untimed. I think most people could have handled another 4 laps....
You miss the point, swim tests are not there because swimming is an integral part of scuba diving, what is being tested is comfort in the water and hence the ability to learn a new set of aquatic skills. NAUI's fifteen cycle requirement exists because when we were putting the standards together I said something on the order of, "if you can't tell how comfortable a person is in a dozen, or so, strokes you're in the wrong business." That made sense and we went with it. Requiring a longer or more arduous swim test only speaks to each agency's view concerning the perspicacity and sagacity of its instructors.Bold added...
That particular drill is another remnant of the military mindset; keeping your rifle out of the water while you swim or get swept toward the beach. It'll probably work for the M16 but it's a little light for the M14.
I'm not arguing that potential divers shouldn't be required to swim but perhaps the qualification could be made relevant. Maybe a backstroke on the surface wearing full scuba equipment? Or maybe swimming underwater using full scuba equipment. How about a surface swim with mask, snorkel and fins. Oh wait, PADI does allow that. True, it's 300m rather than 200m but at least it is somewhat related to diving.
A surface swim with no gear, in a pool, just isn't relevant. It's being used as a filter. And the longer the swim, the shorter the time, the less porous the filter.
Strengthening the swimming test to filter out candidates in an attempt to reduce turnover seems questionable. Who cares about the turnover rate? People come, people go, some stay longer than others.
Richard
Aw, shucks.Nude, I really do enjoy the way you think. Someday it would be nice to dive with you. :cool2:
i dont want to be a prude or anything. but according to your profile on SB (which could be updated) Padi AOW????
I would refuse to create a page for new divers to read... when im also new.
That being said.. I totally agree with boulder.. great response!
If i was to say anything to any new diver it would be.. relax, check air and watch bouyancy and have fun, the certified instructor will let them know what to do next.
if you're that hardcore into it, i would suggest further training and gue, but if you're not even an instructor.. you really shouldnt be spouting ideas to new divers...