Zach The Diver
Contributor
Running out of intelligent responses, are we?Somebody feels that PADI touched them in their nono square after paying for just that experience...
![]()
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Running out of intelligent responses, are we?Somebody feels that PADI touched them in their nono square after paying for just that experience...
![]()
Yet Lorenzoid makes a statement that highlights how well-known it is. Is his statement hyperbolic and nonsensical as well?You said: "EVERYONE is intimately familiar with this case."
I quoted that and said that is hyperbole and nonsense.
His statement was:Yet Lorenzoid makes a statement that highlights how well-known it is. Is his statement hyperbolic and nonsensical as well?
If you don't see the difference between that and what you said (hint: "EVERYONE" and "intimately familiar") then I can't help you.Many of us are familiar with the case.
His statement was:
If you don't see the difference between that and what you said (hint: "EVERYONE" and "intimately familiar") then I can't help you.
Keep on digging.
I am beginning to understand that facts and details do not matter to you.
At this point I’ll second that. Things have gotten too counterproductive to rationalize continuing this discussion.Why not just have a Mod erase this thread in entirety please? A little research of past threads would have provided all the needed answers and infighting and bad vibes.
There are some subjects that bear continuous discussion and new threads, this is not one of them.
Peace Out.
Many of us, though perhaps not even everyone on SB, are familiar with the case. There are over 1,700 posts about the case in this thread: Suit filed in case of "Girl dead, boy injured at Glacier National Park I did not participate much in that thread, but if I recall (someone correct me) the case ended with a settlement, and PADI was not found liable by a jury for any failures or practices. You, like the parties in that case and those of us who voiced opinions in that thread, are entitled to your opinion. An opinion is not the same as being "aware" of a fact.EVERYONE is intimately familiar with this case. EVERYONE- including PADI’s most ardent defenders- is aware of the organization’s failures and reprehensible practices.
Many of us, though perhaps not even everyone on SB, are familiar with the case. There are over 1,700 posts about the case in this thread: Suit filed in case of "Girl dead, boy injured at Glacier National Park I did not participate much in that thread, but if I recall (someone correct me) the case ended with a settlement, and PADI was not found liable by a jury for any failures or practices. You, like the parties in that case and those of us who voiced opinions in that thread, are entitled to your opinion. An opinion is not the same as being "aware" of a fact.
.... Or PADI totally didn’t hold a suspect dive shop accountable and attempt to distance themselves when a student got killed?
I could go on and on.
Let’s hear about how this is nonsense.
But a similar incident happened with this shop a couple of years before (I believe?), and PADI failed to police them up or address their issues.