Hatul
Contributor
Are Atomic products sold on the internet by legitimate dealers? Are they highly discounted?
Everyone is selling for the same $1200 price. What happened to the free market?
I thought price fixing was illegal?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Are Atomic products sold on the internet by legitimate dealers? Are they highly discounted?
it is a free market. You may purchase the Atomics Cobalt anywhere you want, nobody is stopping you. Hopefully, you'll purchase through an Authorized Dealer. And nobody is stopping you from "naming your own price".Everyone is selling for the same $1200 price. What happened to the free market?
I thought price fixing was illegal?
The battery would be covered by warranty for at least two years. The retail price on a replacement is $50, but based on what we have seen in the last few years testing, the batteries will be for all practical purposes a permanent part of the computer.I'm not a fan of the rechargeable battery. More flexibility with a user replaceable and when the rechargeable does die, I bet it'll cost an arm and a leg to replace.
Initially we were going to market the Cobalt with an analog compass. But over the last few years digital compasses improved so much in size, price, and performance (coupled with accelerometers for positioning) that we felt in the end the digital compass provided better performance with much less bulk. We get to piggyback on the technology developed for smart phones, etc.I'd be strongly drawn to the Cobalt based on the promise of a very intuitive interface not needing much time in the manual.
My one concern would be having read elsewhere that digital compasses often aren't as 'good' as 'real' (traditional, analog) ones. Anyone care to comment on that angle? Is using the Cobalt's digital compass much different from using the compass module on a ProPlus 2.1?
Richard.
If you hold it straight up or down so you are not pointing it in a particular compass direction, then no, it can't tell what to display. But if the computer's X axis (the line between the hose connection and the front, the long axis) is pointed in a direction relative to the earth's magnetic vector, then it will display the heading, regardless of how you hold the display.RonR,
Just to make sure that I understand you correctly, is the compass reading accurate even if I hold the computer vertically and pointing straight up?
BTW, does the Cobalt display tissue loading graphically (like the Edge/Phoenix used to do)?
If you hold it straight up or down so you are not pointing it in a particular compass direction, then no, it can't tell what to display. But if the computer's X axis (the line between the hose connection and the front, the long axis) is pointed in a direction relative to the earth's magnetic vector, then it will display the heading, regardless of how you hold the display.
If you're holding the computer in front of you, pointing north, and then swing your arm around so the computer is over your head pointing south- with the display facing down so you can still read it- as it passes through vertical the compass will flip from reading north to south.
In most of the earth, the magnetic vector lines are not parallel to the surface, so the exact point where it flips will not be exactly at vertical. That's also part of the reason the compass needs to be calibrated when you change your geographic location significantly.
There is no Edge type graphic multiple tissue loading display- it was cool, but it took a lot of screen space. There is a graphic across the top of the display Cobalt Guide: The Dive Screen that progresses from green to yellow to orange as the no-stop time is used and one moves into decompression. We actually use different numbers of tissue groups depending on the part of the algorithm that is being called up. Generally, in working the interface over the years, we found that for most information simple numbers, if logically presented, worked better than a graphic. We tried graphic representations of tank pressure or depth, for instance, and found they actually lessened comprehension compared with numbers.