The relevance is that it is much easier on THEM if THEY can make you believe it is a DOT requirement.
It is for them, just not the user/driver/breather.
Assuming they are charging $$ for the fills that = "packaging used commerce"
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The relevance is that it is much easier on THEM if THEY can make you believe it is a DOT requirement.
It is for them, just not the user/driver/breather.
Assuming they are charging $$ for the fills that = "packaging used commerce"
I have no first hand experience about "tank checks" but I swore I read it somewhere... oh well, carry on!
In Japan there is no required visual for steel tanks, only a hydro every 5 years. I take good care of my tanks, so I think I might skip the visuals to avoid the PITA of breaking down doubles.
In the case of an accident, OSHA, which requires cylinder handling within the CGA rules, will apply.
OSHA has authority even before an accident occurs, though I'll grant that the odds of their investigating an LDS's compliance prospectively is unlikely. In any event, you're going to need to provide an actual citation to some OSHA statement on the subject, be it a standard, advisory letter, whatever...otherwise you're just another babbling opinion about what's "required".