I'm an AOW/Nitrox/Solo certified diver with 45 years experience, 745 dives to date. I've dived in the cold dark waters of the Atlantic off my own boat, and to depths of 140 feet , and run reels during penetrations in low visibility wrecks. I carry a 2nd bottle as a redundant gas supply and routinely deploy my dsmb from depth at the end of drift dives. On my recent liveaboard in Australia I had to "try out" to prove my skills were adequate enough to solo dive. They had me go through a battery of skills tests, and ultimately gave me the ok. Towards the end of the trip the dive leader told me that many divers try out for the solo diving, often bringing tons of tech gear and they don't make the cut. I was actually one of the few over the past few years that they gave the green light to. I'm not bragging, (although the validation was nice), I'm just making the point that I'm an experienced diver.
I'd think that my credentials are sufficient for any diving within recreational limits but recently I have run into a few dive operators who question the fact that I do not have Deep Dive and Wreck Dive certifications. It has not yet prevented me from doing any dive in particular but it seems to be a trend lately. Those 2 dive operators were in Australia and Thailand.
As I am now retired and living in Europe I'm expanding into other areas on the other side of the world and I'm wondering if this is going to be an issue.
Not really looking to spend the time and the money on two specialties that are not going to teach me anything I don't already know, just to be certain I won't be prohibited from diving a deep wreck because of an overly restrictive dive operator.
In your experience, have you run into this issue, does it seem to be happening more often, and if so, where and with which dive operator? Did it prompt you to get one or both of those specialties?