And what does it accomplish to introduce students to new experiences when they're not yet comfortable with the experiences they got from their OW class?
Sorry, but I have real issues with that approach.
First off, if so many people are coming out of AOW stating (as they do repeatedly on ScubaBoard) that they didn't get anything out of their AOW class, why isn't that a red flag to the agencies that maybe they should take a closer look at how the class is being taught ... rather than simply how it's being marketed?
Second, all of the agencies require a deep dive as part of their AOW (or whatever they choose to call the post-OW con-ed) class. How can they justify taking a student who isn't even comfortable with the basics of buoyancy control to 100 feet? Or certifying them to dive to that depth after only a single "experience" dive where they didn't even bother to teach them anything about how to prepare for a deep dive?
Based on your comments above, it sounds like the objective of AOW isn't to actually teach the student anything ... it's to use AOW as a means to sell more specialty classes. I have a real problem with that ... in my neck of the water, that's a great way to set a new diver up with a false sense of security that can land them in a really bad situation ... because at the end of the class you're handing them a card that says they're qualified to go do those dives they just "experienced". To my concern, before they get that card, they should have adequate knowledge and skills to go do those dives safely.
Well, based on some of the previous replies in this thread it sounds like a lot of people didn't feel qualified to dive on their own after OW class. How many other "divers" come out of those classes without such a well-developed sense of survival ... despite a C-card that allows them to acquire the gear and take the trips?
What are you really selling? And what is your primary objective? Shouldn't it be the safety and well-being of your students?
... Bob (Grateful Diver)