amado_sarhan
Registered
Consider the new technology they are calling "SubWave sonar", I doubt...Does anybody know if it is possible to use the (old) T1 transmitters on the new MK3i? Anyway - i wouldn`t be surprised if it is a no go….
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Consider the new technology they are calling "SubWave sonar", I doubt...Does anybody know if it is possible to use the (old) T1 transmitters on the new MK3i? Anyway - i wouldn`t be surprised if it is a no go….
It is called "SubWave sonar" with MK2i and T1 too. Just that they've increased the limit from 5 transmitters to 8 and are adding messaging with MK3i and T2.Consider the new technology they are calling "SubWave sonar", I doubt...
The Descent Mk2 series (and some other Garmin watches) have had tide tables for years. They work fine, you can get accurate tides for your current location or search anywhere in the world. But it only works with a smartphone data connection. The tide tables aren't actually stored on the watch.I'm looking forward to the reviews. Especially of the tide tables and dive maps -that seem to be included- are any good. But again: the price.....
Yes. You're right. I'm an old school diver, all of this is new to meIt is called "SubWave sonar" with MK2i and T1 too. Just that they've increased the limit from 5 transmitters to 8 and are adding messaging with MK3i and T2.
They wanted to keep it cheap...I was surprised they didn't include the latest version of the heart rate sensor (the Elevate 5), allowing ECG and skin temp readings, that they've put in the latest Epix, Fenix, and many other watches. Why would they skip that here?
The compatibility chart lists the Mk3i as compatible with T1. You lose the messaging capabilities.Does anybody know if it is possible to use the (old) T1 transmitters on the new MK3i? Anyway - i wouldn`t be surprised if it is a no go….
I don't think we can state that. The T1 is currently transmit only. If a software update was all that is needed to receive, then why develop the T2? I haven't opened up a T1, and don't intend to, but I'm thinking the circuitry is not there for the T1 to listen. It would need to listen in order to receive the message from the DC.With a software update, the T1 can transmit a name along with pressure, etc like with T2.
I don't think we can state that. The T1 is currently transmit only. If a software update was all that is needed to receive, then why develop the T2. I haven't opened up a T1, and don't intend to, but I'm thinking the circuitry is not there for the T1 to listen. It would need to listen in order to receive the message from the DC.
So, maybe I misunderstood. What would you want in that name that gets sent? I thought you were referring to being able to send messages like the T2 can.Being able to name the T1 and T2 doesn't require sonar receiving capabilities. It just requires some way for a watch or computer to communicate with them on the surface, which is available on both T1 and T2.